Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The reaction of [{Ir(η5-C5Me5)Cl2}2] with nido-6-SB9H11 and a non-nucleophilic base yields [8-(η5-C5Me5)-nido-8,7-IrSB9H11]1, whereas with the [arachno-6-SB9H12]– anion it yields [8-(η5-C5Me5)-9-Cl-nido-8,7-IrSB9H10]2, [8-(η5-C5Me5)-10-Cl-nido-8,7-IrSB9H10]3 and [1-(η5-C5Me5)-closo-1,2-IrSB9H9]4. With [Ir(CO)Cl(PPh3)2], Cs[B9H12] yields a compound formulated as [exo-9-{Cl-trans-(PPh3)2-cis-H2Ir}-arachno-6-SB9H11] which, on thermolysis, yields 9-(PPh3)-arachno-6-SB9H11. The crystal and molecular structures of Cs[arachno-6-SB9H12] and compound 2 have been established by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis, and all the iridathiaboranes have been examined in detail by 1H and 11B single and multiple magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nestor et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: