Key result
OCTA-derived radial peripapillary capillary perfusion area outperforms CSVD burden score in distinguishing vascular dementia from VMCI.
Why the study?
Retinal and choroidal microvascular parameters were investigated as potential biomarkers for vascular cognitive impairment in patients with internal carotid artery stenosis.
Does optical coherence tomography angiography-derived radial peripapillary capillary perfusion area better distinguish vascular dementia from vascular mild cognitive impairment compared to MRI-based biomarkers in patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis?
Observational (n=123)
Does optical coherence tomography angiography-derived radial peripapillary capillary perfusion area better distinguish vascular dementia from vascular mild cognitive impairment compared to MRI-based biomarkers in patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis?
p-value: p=0.047
OCTA-derived macular radial peripapillary capillary perfusion area may serve as a superior noninvasive biomarker compared to MRI for distinguishing vascular dementia from mild cognitive impairment in patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis.
OCTA radial peripapillary capillary perfusion may better distinguish vascular dementia from VMCI than CSVD score; leaves open biomarker role pending prospective validation.
Objective We investigated retinal and choroidal microvascular parameters as potential biomarkers for vascular cognitive impairment in patients with internal carotid artery stenosis (ICAS). Methods We enrolled 123 asymptomatic ICAS patients and categorized them into vascular mild cognitive impairment (VMCI) and vascular dementia (VaD) groups using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Optical coherence tomography angiography was used to evaluate vessel densities and perfusion areas in various retinal layers. Magnetic resonance imaging-based neuroimaging biomarkers for cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) were also assessed. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression identified predictor variables, and receiver operating curve analysis assessed the ability of key parameters to distinguish between VMCI and VaD. Results Compared with VMCI patients, VaD patients had lower radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) perfusion area, higher CSVD burden score, and larger white matter hyperintensity volume (all p < 0.05). Receiver operating curve analysis revealed that the RPC perfusion area of the affected eye had superior discriminatory power for distinguishing VaD from VMCI compared with both the CSVD burden score ( Z = 1.99, p = 0.047) and white matter hyperintensity ( Z = 1.97, p = 0.049). The optimal cutoff value for the 0–1 mm macular RPC perfusion area was determined as 0.068 mm 2 . Conclusion The optical coherence tomography angiography-derived RPC perfusion area can effectively differentiate VaD from VMCI, suggesting its potential as a noninvasive diagnostic method to support clinical decision-making for ICAS patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Internal carotid artery stenosis (ICAS) (n=123). Optical coherence tomography angiography-derived radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) perfusion area vs. Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) burden score and white matter hyperintensity was evaluated on Discriminatory power for distinguishing vascular dementia from vascular mild cognitive impairment (p=0.047). The OCTA-derived radial peripapillary capillary perfusion area had superior discriminatory power for distinguishing vascular dementia from VMCI compared with CSVD burden score (Z=1.99, p=0.047).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: