PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2025European Respiratory Journal17 citationsOpen Access

Survival trends in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: an observational study

TKTakatoyo KikoRARyotaro AsanoYYYusuke Yoshikawa

Key Result

Management in the current era (2010-2023) was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality in patients with CTEPH compared to the early era (1980-1999) (HR 0.130; 95% CI 0.067-0.254; p<0.001).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=834)

Structured PICO

Has the long-term survival of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension improved over recent decades?

P
Population
834 patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension evaluated retrospectively across three eras to assess long-term survival trends.
E
Exposure
Management in the current era (October 2010–December 2023) or middle era (January 2000–September 2010)
C
Comparator
Management in the early era (April 1980–December 1999)
O
Outcome
All-cause mortalityhard clinical

Survival in patients with CTEPH has significantly improved over the past four decades, corresponding with increased adoption of multimodal treatment.

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 0.13 (95% CI 0.067–0.254)

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

Background Treatment options for patients with chronic thromboembolic hypertension (CTEPH) have increased over the past decade. However, it is unknown whether the outcomes of patients with CTEPH have changed as well. Methods This retrospective study analysed the data of 834 patients with CTEPH, categorised into early (April 1980–December 1999), middle (January 2000–September 2010) and current (October 2010–December 2023) eras. The primary end-point was all-cause mortality. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess changes in all-cause mortality after adjusting for confounding variables. Results 95, 210 and 529 patients were from the early, middle and current eras, respectively. The proportion of patients who did not receive CTEPH therapy decreased from 65% in the early era to 36% and 3% in the middle and current eras, respectively. Meanwhile, the adoption of multimodal treatment increased from 0% to 58% over time. The Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed significant improvements in overall survival (log-rank p<0.001). The 5-year survival rates improved from 68% in the early era to 85% and 93% in the middle and current eras, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratios for mortality were 0.291 (95% CI 0.154–0.550; p<0.001) for the early versus middle era, 0.447 (95% CI 0.249–0.804; p=0.007) for the middle versus current era and 0.130 (95% CI 0.067–0.254; p<0.001) for the early versus current era. Conclusion The long-term prognosis of patients with CTEPH has significantly improved in recent decades.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kiko et al. (2025) conducted an observational in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) (n=834). Current era (October 2010-December 2023) vs. Early era (April 1980-December 1999) was evaluated on all-cause mortality (HR 0.130, 95% CI 0.067-0.254, p=<0.001). Management in the current era (2010-2023) was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality in patients with CTEPH compared to the early era (1980-1999) (HR 0.130; 95% CI 0.067-0.254; p<0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa42a150769d664f7555af7https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.02268-2024
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper