Why the study?
Data were sparse regarding the female-specific clinical features, treatment patterns, and long-term survival of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
Does invasive revascularization (PEA or BPA) improve survival compared to medical therapy alone in female patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension?
Cohort (n=160)
Does invasive revascularization (PEA or BPA) improve survival compared to medical therapy alone in female patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension?
Hazard Ratio: 0.26 (95% CI 0.07–0.97)
In female patients with CTEPH, invasive revascularization with PEA or BPA significantly improves long-term survival compared to medical therapy alone.
Supports invasive options in female CTEPH; leaves open randomized confirmation of survival benefit.
Sparse data are available on the female-specific features of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). We prospectively enrolled 160 consecutive female patients who were firstly diagnosed with CTEPH between 2013 and 2019 to explore their clinical phenotypes, treatment patterns, and long-term survival. The patients' mean age was 54.7 ± 13.8 years, 70.6% provided a confirmed history of venous thromboembolism, 46 (28.8%) patients underwent pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), 65 (40.6%) received balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA), and 49 (30.6%) were treated with medical therapy alone. The patients were followed for a median of 51 (34-70) months; three patients were lost to follow-up, and twenty-two patients died. The estimated survival rates at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were 98.1% (95% CI 96.0-100), 96.9% (95% CI 94.2-99.6), 85.1% (95% CI 78.1-92.2), and 76.2% (95% CI 65.2-87.2), respectively. After adjusting for the confounders, the results of the multivariate Cox analysis showed that the presence of anemia (5.56, 95% CI 1.6-19.22) was associated with an increased risk of all-cause death, and compared with medical treatment, receiving PEA and BPA decreased the risk of death by 74% (0.26, 95% CI 0.07-0.97) and 86% (0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.57), respectively. In conclusion, in the modern era of CTEPH treatment, invasive revascularization combined with targeted therapy display good clinical outcomes for females; anemia should be actively modified, which may lead to clinical improvements. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05360992).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) (n=160). Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) or balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) vs. Medical therapy alone was evaluated on All-cause death (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.07-0.97).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: