Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of liver disease in patients with a high risk of postbiopsy bleeding presents a diagnostic challenge. Mini-laparoscopy offers the possibility of coagulation of biopsy site and the additional advantage of macroscopic liver assessment. We wished to assess the value and safety of mini-laparoscopy with guided biopsy as a diagnostic approach in patients in whom percutaneous liver biopsy is considered contraindicated because of a marked coagulopathy. METHODS: We investigated 61 consecutive patients with marked coagulopathy (prolonged international normalized ratio > 1.5, thrombocytopenia < 50/nl, or both; von Willebrand's disease/hemophilia). Diagnostic mini-laparoscopy with visually guided liver biopsy was undertaken for the evaluation of liver disease. Biopsy sites were coagulated prophylactically (n = 4) or therapeutically (n = 52). Safety, diagnostic yield, and therapeutic consequences were assessed. RESULTS: Macroscopic assessment of the liver was possible in 60/61 high-risk patients and was considered diagnostic in 1/61. In 58 of the remaining 60 patients, liver biopsy was technically feasible. There was no persistent postbiopsy bleeding. One patient with fulminant hepatic failure had self-limiting bleeding from the abdominal wall. Ninety-seven percent of the biopsies were of adequate size for diagnostic histological evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Mini-laparoscopy with guided liver biopsy allows reliable and safe evaluation of liver disease in patients with severe coagulopathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Denzer et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: