The sites of phosphorylation of the interferon (IFN)induced protein designated Pi isolated from mouse L29 cells were characterized by partial proteolysis peptide mapping and by phosphoamino acid analysis.The Mr = 67,000 protein P 1 phosphorylated in the presence of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) was isolated from ribosomnal salt wash fractions of untreated and IFNtreated cells by poly(rI).poly(rC)-Sepharoseaffinity chromatography and preparative sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.IFN treatment increased the amount of dsRNA-activated P 1 phosphorylation about 5-fold; the dsRNA-activated phosphorylation slightly altered the mobility of P 1 on sodium dodecyl sulfate gels.The partial proteolysis phosphopeptide maps obtained with Staphylococcus aureus V8 protease and with a-chymotrypsin showed that P 1 from untreated cells and P 1 from cells treated with natural or cloned IFNs were very similar if not identical.A protein of Mr = 64,000 present in both untreated and IFN-treated cells was phosphorylated in the absence of dsRNA.This protein bound to poly(rI)-poly(rC)-Sepharose and was designated pre-P because it shared all major and minor phosphopeptides except for one with P 1 .A major phosphopeptide designated Xds generated by digestion with V8 protease was present in P 1 but was absent from pre-Pi.Phosphoserine was the major O-phosphoester linkage in both P 1 and pre-Pi; no phosphotyrosine was detected in either P 1 or pre-Pi.These results suggest that the Mr = 64,000 protein designated pre-PI phosphorylated in the absence of dsRNA and the Mr = 67,000 protein designated P 1 phosphorylated in the presence of dsRNA are two structurally different forms of the same protein or very similar proteins and that the uninduced protein P 1 of untreated cells and the IFN-induced protein P 1 differ in amount but not in the pattern of phosphorylation.IFNs 1 are regulatory proteins that can profoundly affect a
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lasky et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: