Key result
Carotid intima-media thickness and arterial stiffness variables significantly predicted the risk of coronary arterial lesions, with each 20 μm increment in IMT increasing the odds by 73% (OR 1.73).
Why the study?
The carotid artery reflects systemic atherosclerosis, and ultrasonographic evaluation of carotid structural and functional lesions is a preferred tool in patients with CAD.
Do carotid artery elasticity variables predict the risk of coronary arterial lesions in patients with suspected CAD?
Cross-Sectional (n=228)
Single-blind
No
Do carotid artery elasticity variables predict the risk of coronary arterial lesions in patients with suspected CAD?
Odds Ratio: 1.73 (95% CI 1.57–1.9)
p-value: p=<0.0001
Ultrasonographic variables of carotid artery elasticity and thickness demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for predicting coronary arterial lesions in patients with suspected CAD.
May support carotid ultrasound for CAD risk stratification in suspected cases; cross-sectional data leave open prospective validation before practice change.
Background: Carotid artery can be considered as the window to reflect systemic artery atherosclerosis. Nowadays, the evaluation of carotid artery lesions both from the structural and functional aspects in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) by ultrasonographic imaging is one of the preferable tools. Materials and Methods: Patients with suspected CAD underwent coronary angiography and were assigned to one of four groups (non-CALs, atherosclerosis, single-lesion and multi-lesion) based on the results. Carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) and arterial stiffness were investigated by quality intima-media thickness (QIMT) and quality arterial stiffness (QAS) techniques. Univariable and multivariable modeling were used to investigate arterial elasticity predictors of CALs. Area under the receive operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy.Results: Carotid IMT and stiffness variables pulse wave velocity (PWV), α, β and compliance coefficient (CC) were statistically different between every two-group comparisons. Multivariable logistic regression analyses demonstrated that the odd ratio (OR) for patients with CALs were 1.73, 1.67, 1.19, 1.23 and 0.56 accordingly as IMT, PWV, α, β and CC were concerned. The OR values were similar with or without. The AUC of IMT, PWV, α, β and CC were 0.9257, 0.8910, 0.8016, 0.9383, 0.8581 with correctly classified rate of 88.16%, 83.77%, 78.07%, 86.84%, and 81.58%, respectively. Conclusions: The ultrasnongraphic variables derived from QIMT and QAS analysis present favorable diagnostic values for patients with CALs. The vascular stiffness changes predicted by QAS variables highlighted the hypothesis that functional impairment might predate structural damages as we can detect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cai et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary artery disease (n=228). Carotid artery elasticity variables (IMT, PWV, α, β, CC) vs. Patients without coronary arterial lesions was evaluated on Presence of coronary arterial lesions (CALs) (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.57-1.90, p=<0.0001). Carotid intima-media thickness and arterial stiffness variables significantly predicted the risk of coronary arterial lesions, with each 20 μm increment in IMT increasing the odds by 73% (OR 1.73).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: