Key result
Echo-guided pacing to 70–80 beats/min improves hemodynamics and reduces regurgitation in severe mixed valvulopathy.
Why the study?
Data are limited on optimal heart rate in pacemaker patients with severe aortic or mitral regurgitation who cannot undergo or decline valve intervention.
Does an echocardiography-guided heart rate titration protocol optimize hemodynamics in a patient with severe AR, moderate MR, and a pacemaker?
Case Report (n=1)
Does an echocardiography-guided heart rate titration protocol optimize hemodynamics in a patient with severe AR, moderate MR, and a pacemaker?
Individualized echocardiography-guided pacemaker heart rate titration can optimize hemodynamics in patients with complex valvular lesions, challenging the assumption that faster rates are always better in aortic regurgitation.
May support individualized echo-guided pacing optimization in pacemaker patients with severe regurgitation; leaves open prospective validation in larger cohorts.
BACKGROUND: Data are limited on the optimal heart rate (HR) in patients with pacemakers and volume loading conditions such as severe aortic regurgitation (AR) or mitral regurgitation (MR) who cannot undergo, or decline, surgical/procedural valve intervention. CASE SUMMARY: A 93-year-old man with remote bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement, mitral regurgitation with a prior mitral clip, sinus node dysfunction, and a dual-chamber pacemaker presented with shortness of breath and was found to have severe AR and moderate MR. A ramp echocardiography-driven HR protocol was used to identify 70 beats/min as his optimal HR to minimize AR and MR and improve cardiac output. DISCUSSION: The optimal HR for patients with volume loading conditions such as severe AR or MR can be determined on an individual basis through serial modulation of the paced HR. It is not necessarily the case that a progressively faster HR results in improved hemodynamic parameters. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: HR modification in patients with chronotropic incompetence and pacemakers can improve cardiac output, particularly in patients with valvular lesions. An echocardiography-guided HR titration protocol should be considered for patients with volume loading conditions such as severe AR or MR to determine a patient-specific optimal HR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caughron et al. (2025) conducted a case report in Severe aortic regurgitation and mitral regurgitation (n=1). Echocardiography-guided heart rate titration (pacemaker ramp protocol) vs. Baseline heart rate (60 beats/min) was evaluated on Hemodynamic optimization (cardiac output, regurgitation severity, and blood pressure). Echocardiography-guided pacemaker heart rate titration to 70-80 beats/min improved cardiac output and reduced valvular regurgitation in a patient with severe aortic and moderate mitral regurgitation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: