Why the study?
Optimal heart rate is a promising therapeutic target in HFrEF, but its implication in patients with left ventricular assist devices remains unknown.
Does a nonoptimal heart rate increase the risk of 1-year mortality and heart failure readmissions in patients with left ventricular assist devices?
Cohort (n=143)
No
Does a nonoptimal heart rate increase the risk of 1-year mortality and heart failure readmissions in patients with left ventricular assist devices?
Hazard Ratio: 1.69 (95% CI 1.02–2.57)
Absolute Event Rate: 38% vs 16%
p-value: p=0.014
A larger difference between actual and ideal heart rate at discharge is associated with increased 1-year mortality and heart failure readmissions in LVAD patients.
Optimal heart rate (HR) is a promising therapeutic target in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Nevertheless, the implication of optimal HR in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) remains unknown. The cohort included consecutive patients with sinus rhythm undergoing LVAD implantation between 2014 and 2018. Ideal HR was calculated as follows: 93 - 0.13 × (deceleration time [msec]). The impact of "HR difference," defined as an HR difference between the actual HR at discharge and the calculated ideal HR, on the 1-year mortality and heart failure readmissions was investigated. A total of 143 patients (55 years old, 101 men) was identified and tertiled considering their HR differences: (1) the optimal HR group (n = 49; HR difference < 27 bpm), (2) the suboptimal HR group (n = 47; HR difference = 27-42 bpm), and (3) the nonoptimal HR group; HR difference (n = 47; HR difference > 43 bpm). The nonoptimal HR group had a significantly higher 1-year cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint compared with the optimal HR group (38% versus 16%, P = 0.029) with a hazard ratio of 1.69 (95% confidence interval 1.02-2.57) adjusted for 6 potential confounders. In conclusion, nonoptimized HR negatively affected clinical outcomes in LVAD patients. The implication of deceleration time-guided HR optimization in LVAD patients should be further investigated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Imamura et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction requiring left ventricular assist device (LVAD) (n=143). Nonoptimal heart rate (actual vs ideal HR difference > 43 bpm) vs. Optimal heart rate (actual vs ideal HR difference < 27 bpm) was evaluated on Composite of 1-year all-cause death and readmissions due to heart failure (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.02-2.57, p=0.014).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: