Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cyclopentadienyl (Cp) ligands have received considerable attention mainly because of their pi six-electron donation capability. Tris(pyrazolyl)borate ligands (Tp) are often compared with Cp because of their identical charge, number of donated electrons, and similar facial coordinating geometry. Their six-electron donation, however, is formally sigma-type. The X-ray structure of the [TpCF3,CH3CuK(mu 4-CO3)KTpCF3,CH3]2 aggregate, 1, reveals for the first time an unprecedented eta 5-TpCF3,CH3 potassium bonding interaction. 1 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1 with a = 12.0411(2) A, b = 14.9791(2) A, c = 16.0567(3) A, alpha = 71.301(1) degrees, beta = 69.785(1) degrees, gamma = 66.539(1) degrees, and Z = 2. Both K-F and K-mu 4-CO3(2-) interactions stabilize the aggregate, as suggested by the lack of hexanuclear aggregation and K incorporation in the absence of fluorine groups or when O=CO2(2-) is replaced by CH3-CO2-. In the latter case we have isolated the complex [CuTpCF3,CH3(CH3CO2)], 2, which retains a Cu coordination sphere similar to that encountered in the TpCF3,CH3Cu subset of 1. The mononuclear complex 2 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2(1)/c with a = 14.1474(2) A, b = 14.1474(2) A, c = 19.0456(6) A, beta = 99.012(2) degrees, and Z = 4. The novel eta 5-coordination mode revealed in 1 suggests that Tp ligands might function not only as sigma donors but also as Cp-like pi donors. The eta 5-coordination mode might therefore constitute a new potential common denominator of these two important classes of ligands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: