Key result
Inoculation with the attenuated Lv17/WB/Rie1 isolate resulted in fewer wild boar testing positive for ASFV in blood, oral fluid, and feces compared to the virulent Armenia07 isolate.
Why the study?
There are safety concerns regarding whether live attenuated vaccines against African swine fever virus are feasible for use in wild boar.
Does inoculation with attenuated ASFV isolate Lv17/WB/Rie1 reduce viral shedding and viremia compared to virulent Armenia07 isolate in wild boar?
Does inoculation with attenuated ASFV isolate Lv17/WB/Rie1 reduce viral shedding and viremia compared to virulent Armenia07 isolate in wild boar?
The attenuated ASFV isolate Lv17/WB/Rie1 results in lower viral shedding and viremia in wild boar compared to the virulent Armenia07 isolate, providing important transmission dynamics data for live attenuated vaccine candidates.
Lv17/WB/Rie1 was associated with reduced ASFV detection in wild boar; hypothesis-generating for attenuated vaccine transmission dynamics.
Since the reappearance of African swine fever virus (ASFV), the disease has spread in an unprecedented animal pandemic in Eurasia. ASF currently constitutes the greatest global problem for the swine industry. The wild boar (Sus scrofa) in which the pathogen has established wild self-sustaining cycles, is a key reservoir for ASFV, signifying that there is an urgent need to develop an effective vaccine against this virus. Current scientific debate addresses whether live attenuated vaccines (LAVs), which have shown promising results in cross-protection of susceptible hosts, may be feasible for vaccinations carried out owing to safety concerns. The objective of this study was, therefore, to compare the ASFV shedding in wild boar infected with virulent and attenuated (LAV) isolates. Different shedding routes (oral fluid and feces) and viremia rates were characterized in wild boar inoculated with Lv17/WB/Rie1 isolate (n = 12) when compared to those inoculated with the virulent Armenia07 isolate (n = 17). In general, fewer animals infected with the Lv17/WB/Rie1 isolate tested positive for ASFV in blood, oral fluid, and feces in comparison to animals infected with the virulent Armenia07 isolate. The shedding patterns were characterized in order to understand the transmission dynamics. This knowledge will help evaluate the shedding of new LAV candidates in wild boar populations, including the comparison with gene deletion mutant LAVs, whose current results are promising.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kosowska et al. (2020) studied African swine fever virus (ASFV) infection (n=29). Lv17/WB/Rie1 isolate (attenuated) vs. Armenia07 isolate (virulent) was evaluated on ASFV shedding (oral fluid and feces) and viremia rates. Inoculation with the attenuated Lv17/WB/Rie1 isolate resulted in fewer wild boar testing positive for ASFV in blood, oral fluid, and feces compared to the virulent Armenia07 isolate.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: