Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The wireless gait assessment tool (Wi-GAT) measures have been shown to have good to excellent concurrent validity with preferred walking speeds, however, the validity of the Wi-GAT measures at slow and fast walking speeds is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To establish validity of the Wi-GAT spatio-temporal gait measures at slow, fast, and preferred walking speeds. METHODS: Twenty two healthy adult volunteers, with a mean age of 25.7 (± 5.3) participated in this study. The spatio-temporal gait variables of each participant were concurrently recorded using the GAITrite and the Wi-GAT system, while the participants performed 3 trials for each walking speed in a randomized order. Intraclass correlation analyses were performed to establish the agreement between the measures recorded by the GAITrite and Wi-GAT systems. RESULTS: Walking speed measured both by the Wi-GAT and the GAITrite systems showed excellent agreement for preferred (ICC = 0.979 p< 0.001), slow (ICC = 0.989 p< 0.001) and fast (ICC = 0.967 p< 0.001) walking speeds. Most gait parameters recorded at slow walking speed showed good (ICC > 0.70) to excellent (ICC > 0.85) agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Gait parameters recorded by the Wi-GAT system showed fair to excellent validity for preferred and slow walking speeds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DesJardins et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: