Key result
Use of furosemide was associated with lower risk of hospitalization for hyponatraemia (aOR 0.61; 95% CI 0.57-0.66), while amiloride (aOR 1.69) and spironolactone (aOR 1.96) increased risk.
Why the study?
While thiazides frequently cause hyponatraemia, data regarding loop diuretics and potassium-sparing agents are limited and partly conflicting.
Does the use of non-thiazide diuretics increase the risk of hospitalization due to hyponatraemia in adults?
Case-Control (n=56,014)
Yes
Does the use of non-thiazide diuretics increase the risk of hospitalization due to hyponatraemia in adults?
Odds Ratio: 0.61 (95% CI 0.57–0.66)
Potassium-sparing diuretics (spironolactone, amiloride) increase the risk of hospitalization for hyponatraemia, particularly early in treatment, whereas ongoing furosemide use appears inversely correlated with this risk.
Should not yet change diuretic selection; these observational associations leave open the need for randomized confirmation.
OBJECTIVE: Diuretics are often implicated in hyponatraemia. While thiazides constitute one of the most common causes of hyponatraemia, data on loop diuretics and potassium-sparing agents are limited and partly conflicting. The objective of this investigation was to study the association between use of different types of non-thiazide diuretics and hospitalization due to hyponatraemia. DESIGN, PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: This was a register-based case-control study on the adult Swedish population. By linking national registers, patients hospitalized with a principal diagnosis of hyponatraemia (n = 11,213) from 1 October 2005 through 31 December 2014 were compared with matched controls (n = 44,801). Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for multiple confounders, was used to analyse the association between use of diuretics and hyponatraemia. In addition, newly initiated use (≤90 days) and ongoing use were examined separately. RESULTS: Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) (95% CI) were 0.61 (0.57-0.66) for the use of furosemide, 1.69 (1.54-1.86) for the use of amiloride and 1.96 (1.78-2.18) for the use of spironolactone and hospitalization due to hyponatraemia. For newly initiated therapy, aORs ranged from 1.23 (1.04-1.47) for furosemide to 3.55 (2.75-4.61) for spironolactone. The aORs for ongoing use were 0.52 (0.47-0.57) for furosemide, 1.62 (1.47-1.79) for amiloride and 1.75 (1.56-1.98) for spironolactone. CONCLUSIONS: Ongoing use of furosemide was inversely correlated with hospitalization due to hyponatraemia, suggesting a protective effect. Consequently, if treatment with furosemide precedes the development of hyponatraemia by some time, other causes of hyponatraemia should be sought. Spironolactone and amiloride may both contribute to hyponatraemia; this effect is most prominent early in treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mannheimer et al. (2021) conducted a case-control in Hyponatraemia (n=56,014). Non-thiazide diuretics (furosemide, amiloride, spironolactone) vs. Matched controls was evaluated on Hospitalization due to hyponatraemia (aOR 0.61, 95% CI 0.57-0.66). Use of furosemide was associated with lower risk of hospitalization for hyponatraemia (aOR 0.61; 95% CI 0.57-0.66), while amiloride (aOR 1.69) and spironolactone (aOR 1.96) increased risk.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: