Key result
Dynamic PCAT ratio >1 linked to radiological or clinical progression in heart transplant recipients.
Why the study?
The relationship between longitudinal changes in pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation and cardiac allograft vasculopathy progression remains poorly defined.
Does the dynamic pericoronary fat attenuation (PCAT) ratio predict cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) progression and adverse clinical events in stable heart transplant recipients?
Cohort (n=127)
No
Does the dynamic pericoronary fat attenuation (PCAT) ratio predict cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) progression and adverse clinical events in stable heart transplant recipients?
Longitudinal changes in pericoronary fat attenuation on CCTA, rather than static measurements, independently predict cardiac allograft vasculopathy progression and adverse clinical events in heart transplant recipients.
May inform CAV surveillance in stable heart transplant recipients; leaves open need for prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) density on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has emerged as a non-invasive marker of perivascular inflammation and a potential prognostic biomarker in heart transplant recipients. However, relationship between the longitudinal changes in PCAT attenuation and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) progression remains poorly defined. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether static PCAT density values and their longitudinal change predict CAV progression and adverse evolution in stable heart transplant recipients. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 127 recipients with clinical, echocardiographic, and biopsy-proven stability undergoing paired CCTA at Padua University Hospital. Proximal, pancoronary, and right coronary artery pericoronary fat attenuation were measured at baseline and follow-up CCTA. RESULTS: Baseline CCTA was performed a median of 7.5 years after transplantation and follow-up 2.0 years later. Radiological CAV progression occurred in 14 patients (11.0%) according to International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation criteria; 20 patients (15.7%) met the composite radiological or clinical endpoint (worsening of New York Heart Association functional class, or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes). Cohort-level PCAT density values and in event-free patients were stable, while subjects presenting composite events showed longitudinal increases in all six attenuation metrics. A newly proposed biomarker, the dynamic PCAT ratio (baseline/follow-up) was consistently higher than 1 in patients with radiological or clinical progression, while remaining close to 1 in event-free subjects. In Firth penalized regression, dynamic PCAT ratios remained associated with the composite endpoint after multivariable and multiplicity adjustment, whereas associations with static measurements did not remain significant after correction. CONCLUSIONS: In heart transplant recipients, temporal evolution of PCAT density, rather than single measurements, appears to capture the biological activity associated with subsequent clinical deterioration, but warrants prospective multicentre validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cordoni et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart transplant recipients (n=127). Dynamic pericoronary fat attenuation (PCAT) ratio vs. Static PCAT density values was evaluated on Composite radiological or clinical endpoint (worsening of New York Heart Association functional class, or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes). An increased dynamic pericoronary fat attenuation ratio (>1) was associated with a composite of radiological or clinical progression, which occurred in 15.7% of heart transplant recipients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: