Key result
Carotid IMT prognostic value for CAD in type 2 diabetes lacks reported results.
Why the study?
Does carotid artery intima-media thickness predict the presence and severity of coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetic patients?
Observational
Does carotid artery intima-media thickness predict the presence and severity of coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetic patients?
Carotid artery intima-media thickness may serve as a noninvasive prognostic marker for the presence and severity of coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.
CIMT prognostic value for CAD in T2D remains unreported; leaves open its utility as noninvasive marker.
Over the past decade, the measurement of carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) using high-resolution B-mode ultrasonography has emerged as one noninvasive method of choice for determining the anatomic extent of atherosclerosis and its progression and for assessing cardiovascular and stroke risk (1–4). In vitro and in vivo studies indicate that carotid artery IMT measurements obtained by ultrasonography correlate well with pathologic measurements, and numerous investigators (5) have demonstrated the reproducibility of this technique and the strong correlation between IMT and classic risk factors (male sex, aging, overweight, elevated blood pressure, high blood cholesterol, diabetes, and smoking). Many studies (6–8) have shown that the incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in diabetic patients is two or three times higher than that in nondiabetic control subjects. A few …
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Melidonis et al. (2003) conducted an observational in Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Artery Disease. Carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) was evaluated on Presence and severity of coronary artery disease. The prognostic value of carotid artery intima-media thickness for coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetic patients was investigated, but results are not reported in the truncated abstract.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: