Why the study?
Systemic fibrinolysis for acute pulmonary embolism carries a substantial bleeding risk, prompting the need for interventional treatments that rapidly remove pulmonary thrombi with minimal hemorrhagic complications.
Do interventional treatments (catheter-directed thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy) improve right ventricular function and minimize bleeding risk in patients with acute pulmonary embolism?
Do interventional treatments (catheter-directed thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy) improve right ventricular function and minimize bleeding risk in patients with acute pulmonary embolism?
Interventional management of acute pulmonary embolism using catheter-directed therapies and mechanical thrombectomy offers effective reduction of right ventricular strain with a lower bleeding risk compared to systemic thrombolysis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports fibrinolysis for rapid RV stabilization in massive PE; leaves open optimal selection and bleeding risk strategies.
Acute pulmonary embolism is the third most common cause of cardiovascular mortality in the world. The sudden pressure overload of the right ventricle, caused by the thrombotic masses in the pulmonary artery, may quickly progress to profound cardiogenic shock. That results in a mortality rate of more than 50% in patients with a massive form of pulmonary embolism. In such cases, systemic fibrinolysis is warranted, which leads to rapid improvement of the right ventricular function and hemodynamic stabilization. The thrombolytic effect of systemic fibrinolysis is, unfortunately, accompanied by an almost 5 times increased risk of bleeding, especially intracranial one. Therefore, in most cases, for patients with uncompromised hemodynamics, only anticoagulation treatment is offered. Interventional treatment of acute pulmonary embolism consists of the usage of very low-dose fibrinolytic devices or percutaneous thrombus aspiration devices. The goal is to provide rapid removal of the thrombotic masses from the pulmonary artery circulation while keeping the hemorrhagic risk at a minimum. This paper will try to provide a concise review of the most widely used and available devices, together with the latest clinical data, supporting their use. Also, the future perspectives in the field of endovascular treatment of acute pulmonary embolism will be presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dobrev et al. (2022) conducted a review in Acute pulmonary embolism. Interventional treatment (catheter-directed thrombolysis and percutaneous thrombectomy) was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: