Key result
An artificial neural network using photoplethysmography and physiological data improved blood pressure estimation, achieving a mean absolute error of 4.74 mm Hg for DBP and 9.18 mm Hg for SBP.
Why the study?
Conventional BP measurement methods have drawbacks, and while photoplethysmography is popular for cuff-less BP estimation, the impact of incorporating subjects' physiological characteristics has not been widely explored.
Does incorporating prior physiological characteristics into photoplethysmography-based machine learning models improve the accuracy of non-invasive cuff-less blood pressure estimation?
Does incorporating prior physiological characteristics into photoplethysmography-based machine learning models improve the accuracy of non-invasive cuff-less blood pressure estimation?
Incorporating patient physiological characteristics such as age, gender, and BMI into photoplethysmography-based machine learning algorithms significantly improves the accuracy of non-invasive, cuff-less blood pressure estimation.
May improve cuffless BP monitoring; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Conventional blood pressure (BP) measurement methods have a number of drawbacks such as being invasive, cuff-based or requiring manual operation. Many studies are focussed on emerging methods of noninvasive, cuff-less and continuous BP measurement, and using only photoplethysmography to estimate BP has become popular. Although it is well known that physiological characteristics of the subject are important in BP estimation, this has not been widely explored. This article presents a novel method which adopts photoplethysmography and prior knowledge of a subject's physiological features to estimate DBP and SBP. Features extracted from a fingertip photoplethysmography signal and prior knowledge of a subject's physiological characteristics, such as gender, age, height, weight and BMI is used to estimate BP using three different machine learning models: artificial neural networks, support vector machine and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. The accuracy of BP estimation obtained when prior knowledge of the physiological characteristics are incorporated into the model is superior to those which do not take the physiological characteristics into consideration. In this study, the best performing algorithm is an artificial neural network which obtains a mean absolute error and SD of 4.74 ± 5.55 mm Hg for DBP and 9.18 ± 12.57 mm Hg for SBP compared to 6.61 ± 8.04 mm Hg for DBP and 11.12 ± 14.20 mm Hg for SBP without prior knowledge. The inclusion of prior knowledge of the physiological characteristics can improve the accuracy of BP estimation using machine learning methods, and the incorporation of more physiological characteristics enhances the accuracy of the BP estimation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2021) studied Blood pressure estimation. Artificial neural network with photoplethysmography and physiological data vs. Model without physiological data was evaluated on Mean absolute error for DBP and SBP. An artificial neural network using photoplethysmography and physiological data improved blood pressure estimation, achieving a mean absolute error of 4.74 mm Hg for DBP and 9.18 mm Hg for SBP.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: