Key result
Female athlete physiology review highlights the need for sex-specific trials to personalize training and nutrition.
Why the study?
Most sports studies are male-centered, leaving a significant gap in knowledge regarding female athlete physiology, injury prevention, training, and recovery.
This review emphasizes the critical need for personalized, sex-specific research and interventions to optimize training, recovery, and injury prevention in female athletes.
Current recommendations for female athletes remain extrapolated; leaves open whether sex-specific interventions improve outcomes.
The physiology of female athletes presents unique challenges in terms of injury prevention, training, and recovery. Although more women are getting involved in sports, the majority of studies are male-centered, leaving a significant gap in information about assessing the needs of female athletes. Hormonal changes, especially during the menstrual cycle, also affect performance and risk for injury and recovery processes, with female players much more prone to injuries such as anterior cruciate ligament ruptures and stress fractures. In addition, relative energy deficiency in sport (REDs) is associated with poor muscle recovery, nutrient deficits, and a higher risk of musculoskeletal injuries. This review fills the existing gaps in the current literature by highlighting the need for sex-specific studies, individualized training programs, and nutrition practices. The absence of high-quality randomized controlled trials and an insufficient number of women in sports science research cannot be allowed. Research should personalize interventions that take into account hormonal changes and enhance long-term performance and recovery among female athletes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2025 study conducted a review in Female athlete physiology, injury prevention, and recovery. A review of female athlete physiology reveals a lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials and highlights the need for sex-specific studies to personalize training and nutrition practices.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: