Key result
Cyclosporine improved one- and five-year survival rates after cardiac transplantation to 85% and 70%, respectively, by reducing mortality from infectious complications.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Advances in immunosuppression, particularly cyclosporine, have significantly improved survival following cardiac transplantation, though rejection, infection, and allograft vasculopathy remain key challenges.
The first decade of orthotopic heart transplantation featured the perfection of the surgical techniques, the use of immunosuppressive drugs, and the introduction of endomyocardial biopsy. Improved survival rates of 85 percent and 70 percent after one and five years, respectively, during the second decade of transplantation were directly attributable to cyclosporine, which reduced mortality from infectious complications. Despite this progress, rejection and infection remain the most important predictors of mortality during the first year after transplantation, and accelerated coronary artery disease is the chief impediment to long-term survival.1 Two socioeconomic matters — limited supplies of organs and costs — are . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valantine et al. (1995) conducted a review in Cardiac Transplantation. Cyclosporine was evaluated on Survival rates after one and five years. Cyclosporine improved one- and five-year survival rates after cardiac transplantation to 85% and 70%, respectively, by reducing mortality from infectious complications.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: