In Brief Background There is a paucity of data regarding long-term renal graft survival in hepatitis C virus positive (HCV+) patients. We analyzed our institution’s experience with HCV+ renal transplantation and factors contributing to subsequent renal graft failure. Methods We analyzed 1,679 adult, deceased donor, single-organ renal transplants occurring between 2000 and 2012. Recipient and donor demographics, HCV serostatus, and graft outcome and function were evaluated. Results Of 1,679 patients, 195 HCV+ recipients (R+) received renal transplants from HCV+ donors (D+), in contrast to 1,418 HCV negative (HCV−) recipients (R−) who received grafts from HCV− donors (D−), and 66 R+ patients who received D− kidneys. Death-censored graft survival in the R+/D+ population was better than graft survival for R+/D− patients, despite R+/D+ patients having higher rates of hypertension and African Americans. Waitlist times for patients accepting HCV+ grafts was 318 days (for R+/D+ patients) versus 613 days (R−/D−) or 570 days (R+/D−). On multivariate analysis, waitlist times were independently predictive of graft failure. Conclusion R+/D+ patients spent less time on the transplant waitlist, which contributed to improved death censored graft survival when compared with R+/D− patients. This single-center, retrospective analysis of hepatitis C positive renal allograft recipients shows that recipients accepting hepatitis C positive donor organs have shorter waiting times and improved survival compared to those accepting hepatitis negative donor organs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scalea et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: