Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CONTEXT: There is a lack of data on pesticide exposure levels during spraying with a knapsack, while it could have important implications for their users' health. METHODS: We assessed levels and determinants of exposure in 24 male private landscapers/gardeners and municipal workers in France in 2011. Actual dermal exposure to glyphosate was assessed with cotton undergarments and gloves, and a cotton coverall changed between mixing and spraying to assess the contribution of each phase and body area to overall contamination. A field monitor observed the whole workshift and filled in a standardized observation grid. RESULTS: The median actual contamination was 5,256 µg for the body, and 4,620 µg for hands. Spraying was more exposing than mixing/loading for all body parts except hands, which contributed to nearly 90% of body exposure during mixing/loading, and 30% during spraying, followed by back (14%). In the most exposed quartile, levels were close to some observations in agriculture. CONCLUSION: Our study provides new data on pesticide exposure levels of knapsack sprayer users; it should lead to a reinforced prevention, in order to make exposures as low as possible and lessen the risk of chronic diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boulanger et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: