Key result
SDS or Nonidet P40 permits characterization of type-specific ribonucleoprotein antigen and influenza A2 neuraminidase.
Sodium dodecyl sulphate and Nonidet P40 are effective disrupting agents for characterizing influenza A ribonucleoprotein and neuraminidase antigens via immunodiffusion.
May inform lab-based influenza antigen studies; leaves open relevance to modern clinical diagnostics or vaccines.
Summary Immunodiffusion and immunoelectrophoretic studies were made with rabbit antisera and purified influenza A viruses disrupted by sodium dodecyl sulphate. These techniques permitted the characterization of the type-specific ribonucleoprotein antigen and influenza A2 neuraminidase. A common precipitin line was obtained with different human and avian influenza A viruses when an antiserum for the ribonucleoprotein antigen of influenza A was used. A rabbit antiserum against purified influenza A2 neuraminidase gave identical precipitin lines with different influenza A2 viruses and with two recombinant strains known to contain influenza A2 neuraminidase, but not with influenza A0, A1 or fowl plague virus. No precipitin line corresponding to haemagglutinin could be detected with influenza A2 viruses treated with sodium dodecyl sulphate. In a comparison of the effects of other virus disrupting agents on the detection of influenza virus antigens by immunodiffusion, only ‘Nonidet P40’ gave results as satisfactory as those obtained with sodium dodecyl sulphate in the characterization of the ribonucleoprotein and neuraminidase antigens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schild et al. (1969) studied Influenza A. Sodium dodecyl sulphate and Nonidet P40 was evaluated on Characterization of type-specific ribonucleoprotein antigen and influenza A2 neuraminidase. Immunodiffusion and immunoelectrophoretic studies using sodium dodecyl sulphate or Nonidet P40 permitted the characterization of type-specific ribonucleoprotein antigen and influenza A2 neuraminidase.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: