Key result
Acute immobilization significantly decreased heart MAO activity in both normotensive and hypertensive rats (p < 0.01), while chronic isolation reduced antioxidative protection.
Acute and chronic stress exert distinct effects on cardiac MAO activity and antioxidative capacity in both normotensive and hypertensive rats.
Hypothesis-generating in rats; human studies required before any clinical relevance to stress-related hypertension.
The heart is an organ especially sensitive to the sympathetic overstimulation and therefore to the influence of stressors and hypertension. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of two distinct types of stressors, acute immobilization (2 h) and chronic isolation stress (21 days), as well as their combined effect on the activity of monoamine oxidase (MAO), superoxide dismutase, catalase (CAT) and the ascorbic acid (AA) content in the heart of normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). The results obtained show that in basal conditions heart MAO and CAT activity (p < 0.05), as well as AA concentration (p < 0.01) were higher in SHR than in normotensive ones. The acute immobilization significantly decreased heart MAO activity in both examined strains (p < 0.01). On the other hand, chronic isolation, separately or in combination with immobilization, did not affect this enzyme, in the heart of either hypertensive or normotensive rats, which was associated with the reduced antioxidative protection (p < 0.01, p < 0.05).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Djordjević et al. (2011) studied Hypertension and stress. Acute immobilization and chronic isolation stress vs. Basal conditions was evaluated on Activity of monoamine oxidase (MAO), superoxide dismutase, catalase (CAT) and ascorbic acid (AA) content in the heart (p=<0.01). Acute immobilization significantly decreased heart MAO activity in both normotensive and hypertensive rats (p < 0.01), while chronic isolation reduced antioxidative protection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: