Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Staphylococcal enterotoxins are able both to stimulate powerful polyclonal proliferative responses and to induce non-responsiveness of T lymphocytes expressing the appropriate T-cell antigen receptor V beta gene products. T-cell clones representative of the human response to house dust mite were identified that express either V beta 3 or V beta 6 gene products. The specificity of the latter was confirmed by serology. Pre-treatment of cloned V beta 3+ T cells with the Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins B or C1 rendered them non-responsive to immunogenic challenge with their natural ligand, while retaining responsiveness to exogenous IL-2. Similarly, exposure of the V beta 6+ dust mite reactive T cells to the staphylococcal enterotoxin of the appropriate specificity, SEE, induced specific anergy. The development of non-responsiveness was associated with changes in the T-cell phenotypes. Downregulation of the T-cell receptor, Ti-CD3, was paralleled by enhanced expression of both CD2 and the IL-2 receptor, CD25. Differential co-modulation of CD4 and Ti-CD3 suggested that for some T cells CD4 may form part of the specific antigen recognition structure. Toxicity of the staphylococcal enterotoxins may be removed by chemical modification, thus their ability functionally to inactivate subpopulations of T cells expressing antigen-specific receptors with shared characteristics may be of potential value in the regulation of allergic diseases if the diversity of the T-cell repertoire proves to be limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Hehir et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: