Key result
Dafodil pericardial bioprosthesis shows 0% structural valve deterioration over five years following surgical valve replacement.
Why the study?
The durability and performance of bioprosthetic valves are pivotal in managing valvular heart disease, warranting long-term evaluation of the Dafodil pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic or mitral valve replacement.
Does the Dafodil pericardial bioprosthesis provide sustained haemodynamic performance, safety, and improved quality of life over 5 years in patients requiring surgical aortic or mitral valve replacement?
Cohort (n=136)
Yes
Does the Dafodil pericardial bioprosthesis provide sustained haemodynamic performance, safety, and improved quality of life over 5 years in patients requiring surgical aortic or mitral valve replacement?
The Dafodil pericardial bioprosthesis demonstrated sustained hemodynamic performance and freedom from structural valve deterioration over 5 years, supporting its safety and efficacy for surgical valve replacement.
Supports early safety of novel bioprosthesis; leaves open comparative durability and adoption pending randomized data.
Objectives The durability and performance of bioprosthetic valves are pivotal in managing valvular heart disease (VHD). This 5-year follow-up study evaluated the long-term clinical safety, haemodynamic performance, and quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes of the Dafodil™ pericardial bioprosthesis in patients undergoing aortic or mitral valve replacement (AVR/MVR). Methods In this prospective, multicenter, first-in-human trial conducted across 19 Indian centers, 136 patients with advanced VHD (67 AVR, 69 MVR) were enrolled. Key endpoints were evaluated over 5 years. Results The mean age of the patients in the AVR and MVR cohorts was 60.2 ± 8.3 years and 49.7 ± 14.4 years, respectively. A total of 124 patients (61 AVR, 63 MVR) completed the 5-year follow-up. In the AVR cohort, mean pressure gradients decreased from 51.2 ± 24.1 mmHg at baseline to 11.3 ± 5.3 mmHg at five years, while effective orifice area (EOA) increased from 0.88 ± 0.56 cm 2 to 1.72 ± 0.52 cm 2 ( p < 0.001). In the MVR group, the indexed EOA improved from 0.68 ± 0.4 cm 2 /m 2 to 1.28 ± 0.39 cm 2 /m 2 ( p < 0.001). Both cohorts exhibited significant improvements in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and SF-12 QoL scores. There were no cases of haemolysis, structural valve deterioration (SVD), or myocardial infarction. At five years, the incidence of all cause of mortality was 9.8% in the AVR group and 22.2% in the MVR group. The major adverse cardiac event-free survival rates were 88.0% (AVR) and 76.7% (MVR). Conclusions Over five years, the bioprosthesis demonstrated sustained haemodynamic performance, clinical safety, and QoL. The absence of SVD and low rates of adverse events encourage its use in young patients requiring surgical valve replacement. Furthermore, a long-term follow-up is warranted to evaluate its durability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hiremath et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Valvular heart disease (n=136). Dafodil pericardial bioprosthesis was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The Dafodil pericardial bioprosthesis demonstrated 0% structural valve deterioration over 5 years, with major adverse cardiac event-free survival rates of 88.0% in the aortic and 76.7% in the mitral valve replacement groups.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: