The growing demand for high-efficiency power conversion has accelerated adoption of wide-bandgap (WBG) devices in DC-DC converters. While SiC and GaN MOSFETs outperform conventional silicon, direct quantitative comparisons under identical buck-converter conditions remain an area of active investigation. This simulation-based study investigates power losses and estimated efficiency of SiC C3M0075120D (1200 V, 75 m ) and GaN GS66508B (650 V, 50 m ) in a 200 V-to-100 V, 50 kHz DC-DC buck converter under identical loads (5 A and 10 A). Using LTspice simulations with manufacturer-supplied models and Double Pulse Test methodology for loss separation, the study explicitly distinguishes switching and conduction losses under fixed operating conditions, providing validated simulation-based quantification for these specific devices. The results indicate that for the GaN device achieves lower modeled total losses than the SiC device at 10 A (6.85 W vs. 17.05 W) and attains higher simulated estimated converter efficiency (99.31% vs. 98.25% at full load). For the two specific devices and simulated operating conditions examined, switching loss remains the dominant loss mechanism at 50 kHz. A frequency sensitivity analysis from 50 to 500 kHz reveals that the GaN device maintains approximately 60% lower losses across the frequency range, with absolute savings increasing from 10.2 W to 91.2 W. These findings apply specifically to the investigated devices and operating conditions, and the comparison involves devices with different voltage ratings. The methodology demonstrates the utility of LTspice as a pre-prototyping tool for WBG converter development, although experimental validation remains necessary to confirm estimated efficiency figures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Setiawan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: