Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A total of 361 patients have been entered into four phase II trials in which gemcitabine was given as a 30 min infusion in a schedule weekly x 3 q4W, at starting doses of 800-1250 mg/m2. Three of these trials produced response rates of 22.5%, 20% and 21.8% (all response rates were independently evaluated by an extramural Oncology Review Board). One small study of 30 evaluable patients produced a disappointing low response rate of 3%, but in this study the mean and median dose delivered was under 700 mg/m2. Gemcitabine was well tolerated with modest levels of traditional cytotoxicities such as myelosuppression, nausea and vomiting, and alopecia. Pooled data from two of the studies show improvement in a number of disease-related symptoms. Objective response rates by prognostic factor were determined: stage IIIa (30.5%), stage IIIb (18.8%), stage IV (19.5%); performance status 0 (31.8%), 1 (16.7%) and 2 (21.7%); female gender (23.5%), male (17.5%); age < 70 (18.6%), age > 70 (21.9%). Gemcitabine can be considered for use as a single agent in patients unable or unwilling to tolerate combination chemotherapy. Dose-response data suggest that a dose of 1000 mg/m2 or more is required for optimal therapeutic effect. The single-agent activity of gemcitabine together with its non-overlapping toxicity and novel mode of action suggest that this agent should also be investigated in combination with other active agents in non-small cell lung cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frances A. Shepherd (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: