Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The redshift evolution of the galaxy two-point correlation function is a fundamental cosmological statistic. To identify similar galaxy populations at different redshifts, we select a strict volume-limited sample culled from the 6100 cataloged Canadian Network for Observational Cosmology field galaxy redshift survey (CNOC2) galaxies. Our high-luminosity subsample selects galaxies having k -corrected and evolution-compensated R luminosities, M , above -20 mag ( H 0 = 100 km s -1 Mpc -1 ), where M ( R ) ≃ -20.3 mag. This subsample contains about 2300 galaxies distributed between redshifts 0.1 and 0.65 spread over a total of 1.55 deg 2 of sky. A similarly defined low-redshift sample is drawn from the Las Campanas Redshift Survey. We find that the comoving two-point correlation function can be described as ξ( r | z ) = ( r 00 / r ) γ (1 + z ) -(3+ -γ) , with r 00 = 5.03 ± 0.08 h -1 Mpc, = -0.17 ± 0.18, and γ = 1.87 ± 0.07 over the z = 0.03-0.65 redshift range, for Ω M = 0.2 and Λ = 0. The measured clustering amplitude and its evolution are dependent on the adopted cosmology. The measured evolution rates for Ω M = 1 and flat Ω M = 0.2 background cosmologies are = 0.80 ± 0.22 and = -0.81 ± 0.19, respectively, with r 00 = 5.30 ± 0.1 and 4.85 ± 0.1 h -1 Mpc, respectively. The sensitivity of the derived correlations to the evolution corrections and details of the measurements is presented. The analytic prediction of biased clustering evolution for only the low-density, ΛCDM cosmology is readily consistent with the observations, with biased clustering in an open cosmology somewhat marginally excluded and a biased Ω M = 1 model predicting clustering evolution that is more than 6 standard deviations from the measured value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2000 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: