Key result
Laser pulse duration does not alter ablation threshold or efficiency.
Why the study?
Does laser pulse duration affect ablation threshold and efficiency in gel phantoms and animal clots?
Does laser pulse duration affect ablation threshold and efficiency in gel phantoms and animal clots?
p-value: p=< 0.05
In an in vitro model, the ablation threshold and efficiency of laser thrombolysis are independent of laser pulse duration across the tested microsecond to millisecond ranges.
May permit flexible pulse durations in laser thrombolysis devices; leaves open translation to human thrombi.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Laser thrombolysis is a means for clearing blood clots in occluded arteries. Many researchers have studied the mechanisms of clot ablation, and research clinicians have used the technique to treat myocardial infarction with a number of different laser systems. Specifically, a 1-microsec pulsed dye laser has been used clinically to remove blood clots in coronary arteries. As a comparative study, the ablation characteristics of lasers with pulse durations in the ranges of 50-150 microsec and 2-10 msec were investigated. Two frequency-doubled Nd:YAG lasers at 532 nm were used in this study. Ablation threshold and ablation efficiency of gel phantoms and thrombus using these two lasers were measured and compared with the results of the pulsed dye laser. The pulsed dye laser in this study operated at 522 nm. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gelatin samples with 150 cm(-1) absorption coefficient at 532 nm and animal clot were confined to 3-mm silicone tubes to measure ablation parameters. Additional samples with 150 cm(-1) absorption coefficient at 522 nm were prepared for use with the pulsed dye laser. A fluorescence technique and photographic bubble detection were used to determine ablation threshold. A spectrophotometric technique was used to determine ablation efficiency. RESULTS: The ablation threshold of the gel phantoms for all three lasers was determined to be 17 +/- 2 mJ/mm(2). Ablation efficiency for the gel phantoms was 1.7 +/- 0.1 microg/mJ. Clot had an ablation efficiency of 2.9 +/- 1.0 microg/mJ. CONCLUSIONS: Ablation threshold and efficiency are independent of laser pulse duration for 1-microsec, 50-150-microsec, and 2-10-msec pulses (P < 0.05).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Viator et al. (1999) studied Blood clots in occluded arteries. Frequency-doubled Nd:YAG lasers (50-150 microsec and 2-10 msec pulse durations) vs. 1-microsec pulsed dye laser (522 nm) was evaluated on Ablation threshold and ablation efficiency (p=< 0.05). Ablation threshold (17 +/- 2 mJ/mm2) and efficiency were independent of laser pulse duration for 1-microsec, 50-150-microsec, and 2-10-msec pulses (P < 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: