Key result
Silicone aortic replicas show ~40% greater distensibility in the arch versus ascending and descending tracts.
Why the study?
Correct estimation of the distensibility of deformable aorta replicas is challenging, particularly when local characterization is required.
A combined in-vitro and in-silico approach demonstrates that local aortic distensibility varies significantly along an aortic replica and should be evaluated directly on the replica rather than on material samples.
The correct estimation of the distensibility of deformable aorta replicas is a challenging issue, in particular when its local characterization is necessary. We propose a combined in-vitro and in-silico approach to face this problem. First, we tested an aortic silicone arch in a pulse-duplicator analyzing its dynamics under physiological working conditions. The aortic flow rate and pressure were measured by a flow meter at the inlet and two probes placed along the arch, respectively. Video imaging analysis allowed us to estimate the outer diameter of the aorta in some sections in time. Second, we replicated the in-vitro experiment through a Fluid-Structure Interaction simulation. Observed and computed values of pressures and variations in aorta diameters, during the cardiac cycle, were compared. Results were considered satisfactory enough to suggest that the estimation of local distensibility from in-silico tests is reliable, thus overcoming intrinsic experimental limitations. The aortic distensibility (AD) is found to vary significantly along the phantom by ranging from 3.0 × 10−3 mmHg−1 in the ascending and descending tracts to 4.2 × 10−3 mmHg−1 in the middle of the aortic arch. Interestingly, the above values underestimate the AD obtained in preliminary tests carried out on straight cylindrical samples made with the same material of the present phantom. Hence, the current results suggest that AD should be directly evaluated on the replica rather than on the samples of the adopted material. Moreover, tests should be suitably designed to estimate the local rather than only the global distensibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Micco et al. (2022) studied Aortic distensibility (phantom model). Deformable silicone aortic replica was evaluated on Aortic distensibility (AD). The aortic distensibility of the silicone replica varied significantly along the phantom, ranging from 3.0 × 10^-3 mmHg^-1 in the ascending and descending tracts to 4.2 × 10^-3 mmHg^-1 in the middle of the aortic arch.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: