Key result
Bazett formula is linked to ~5-fold higher odds of flagging prolonged QTc versus Fridericia.
Why the study?
Anticancer therapies are associated with QT interval prolongation and increased arrhythmia risk, prompting evaluation of this risk in cardiovascular disease-free patients with cancer.
Does systemic anticancer therapy cause significant QTc prolongation in cardiovascular disease-free cancer patients?
Cohort (n=291)
Yes
Does systemic anticancer therapy cause significant QTc prolongation in cardiovascular disease-free cancer patients?
Odds Ratio: 5.49 (95% CI 3.28–9.19)
Absolute Event Rate: 10.9% vs 2.2%
Cancer patients receiving systemic therapy have a low risk of significant QTc prolongation, and the Fridericia formula should be preferred to avoid overestimating risk.
Bazett formula may overestimate QTc prolongation risk versus Fridericia in cancer patients on therapy; leaves open preferred correction method for monitoring.
Background/Objectives: Anticancer therapies are associated with a prolongation of QT interval of electrocardiogram (ECG), increasing the risk of arrhythmias. To evaluate this risk in cardiovascular disease-free subjects with cancer, ECG recorded at baseline, months 3, 6 and 12 from 291 participants from the ONCOECHO database were analyzed. Methods: Both Fridericia (QTcF), considered as standard, and Bazett (QTcB) formulas were used to calculate corrected QT (QTc). Results: The study cohort consisted of 61.8% subjects with breast cancer, 26.5% with hematologic malignancies, 7.3% with colorectal cancer and 4.4% of patients with kidney cancer. At baseline, six patients had a QTcF ≥ 460 ms and one ≥ 500 ms. QTcF values differed significantly across time points (p = 0.0125), with a significant increase between baseline and month 6 (400.9 ± 29 ms vs. 409.6 ± 25 ms, p = 0.0075). Use of the Bazett formula resulted in 5.49 (95% CI 3.28–9.19) higher odds of identification of QTc ≥ 460 ms than with the Fridericia rule. A LASSO logistic regression model identified age, QTcF at baseline and month 3 to increase odds of QTcF ≥ 460 ms, whereas higher ejection fraction was associated with decreased odds. Conclusions: Analysis shows that cancer patients receiving cardiotoxic therapy are at relatively low risk of QTc prolongation, but choosing the appropriate QTc correction formula is essential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siński et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Newly diagnosed cancer initiating systemic therapy (n=291). Bazett formula for QTc correction vs. Fridericia formula for QTc correction was evaluated on Identification of QTc ≥ 460 ms (OR 5.49, 95% CI 3.28-9.19). The use of the Bazett formula resulted in 5.49 times higher odds of identifying QTc ≥ 460 ms compared to the Fridericia formula in cancer patients receiving systemic therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: