Key result
Baseline electrocardiographic signs, including right (4.1%) and left (2.1%) bundle branch blocks, heart rate, and cQT-interval, were independently predictive of mortality and heart failure.
Why the study?
Do baseline electrocardiographic signs predict mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease?
Population
5,231 patients with Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (participants of the PROactive trial)
Comparison
Presence of baseline electrocardiographic signs vs Absence of these electrocardiographic signs or…
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
May refine risk stratification in type 2 diabetes with CVD; leaves open whether ECG-guided interventions alter outcomes.
Cohort (n=5,231)
Do baseline electrocardiographic signs predict mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease?
Easily assessable baseline ECG signs, including heart rate, cQT-interval, and bundle branch blocks, independently predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in patients with Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
Pfister et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (n=5,231). Electrocardiographic signs was evaluated on Total mortality, composite secondary endpoint (death, myocardial infarction and stroke), and serious adverse heart failure events. Baseline electrocardiographic signs, including right (4.1%) and left (2.1%) bundle branch blocks, heart rate, and cQT-interval, were independently predictive of mortality and heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: