Key result
E1224 does not alter T. cruzi genetic variability versus placebo, suggesting no resistant parasite selection.
Why the study?
The role that the genetic diversity of natural Trypanosoma cruzi populations plays in response to trypanocidal treatment in chronic Chagas disease patients remains to be understood.
Does E1224 treatment select for resistant Trypanosoma cruzi parasite populations in adult chronic indeterminate Chagas disease patients?
Cohort (n=188)
Double-blind
Randomized
Yes
Does E1224 treatment select for resistant Trypanosoma cruzi parasite populations in adult chronic indeterminate Chagas disease patients?
p-value: p=>0.05
Trypanocidal treatment with E1224 does not appear to select for resistant T. cruzi parasite populations in patients with chronic Chagas disease.
Reassures on resistance risk with E1224 in Chagas; leaves open its clinical utility pending confirmatory trials.
BACKGROUND: The role that the genetic diversity of natural Trypanosoma cruzi populations plays in response to trypanocidal treatment of chronic Chagas disease (CD) patients remains to be understood. We analysed the genetic polymorphisms of parasite bloodstream populations infecting chronic CD patients enrolled in the E1224 clinical trial. METHODS: A total of 506 baseline and post-treatment follow-up samples from 188 patients were analysed. T. cruzi satellite DNA (satDNA) was amplified and sequenced using cruzi1/cruzi2 primers, and samples with TcI/III, TcII, TcIV or hybrid satDNA sequences were identified. Minicircle signatures were obtained after kinetoplast DNA amplification using 121/122 primers and restriction enzyme digestion. Genetic distances between baseline and post-treatment minicircle signatures were estimated using the Jaccard coefficient. RESULTS: At baseline, 74.3% TcII, 17.9% hybrid and 7.8% TcI/III satDNA sequences were found, whereas at the end of follow-up the distribution was 55.2% TcII, 35.2% hybrid and 9.5% TcI/III. The placebo arm was the treatment group with the highest variation of satDNA sequences between baseline and post-treatment follow-up. Genetic distances between baseline and post-treatment minicircle signatures were similar among all treatment arms. No association between minicircle signature variability and satDNA type distribution was found. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic variability of T. cruzi bloodstream populations during post-treatment follow-up did not differ from that observed during chronic infection in the absence of treatment, suggesting that there were no selection events of E1224-resistant parasite populations. This is the first report documenting the genetic polymorphism of natural T. cruzi populations in chronic patients in the context of clinical trials with trypanocidal drugs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramı́rez et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Chronic indeterminate Chagas disease (n=188). E1224 (ravuconazole prodrug) vs. Placebo and Benznidazole was evaluated on Genetic distance (Jaccard coefficient) between baseline and post-treatment T. cruzi minicircle signatures (p=>0.05). Genetic variability of T. cruzi bloodstream populations during post-treatment follow-up did not differ between E1224 treatment arms and placebo, suggesting no selection of E1224-resistant parasite populations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: