Key result
Topical papaverine best prevents IMA spasm, though no treatment is acceptable as flow naturally doubles.
Why the study?
Do vasodilators prevent spasm of the internal mammary artery in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?
Systematic Review
Do vasodilators prevent spasm of the internal mammary artery in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?
Topical and periarterial papaverine has the strongest evidence for preventing internal mammary artery spasm during CABG, though no treatment is also an acceptable strategy as flow naturally improves over time.
Supports selective papaverine use in high-spasm-risk CABG; extends Level 1 evidence validating observation as routine alternative.
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was which (if any) vasodilator prevents spasm of the internal mammary artery in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Two hundred papers were found using the reported search, of which 13 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results, and study weaknesses were tabulated. We conclude that mammary arteries often have low flow initially, but invariably will double their flow after 15-20 min even with no treatment. The strongest evidence for safe prevention of spasm is for papaverine given topically and periarterially, however many studies have also shown no benefit and thus no treatment at all is an entirely acceptable strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S. Sivalingam (2005) conducted a systematic review in Coronary artery bypass grafting. Vasodilators (papaverine) vs. No treatment was evaluated on Prevention of spasm of the internal mammary artery. Topical and periarterial papaverine provides the strongest evidence for preventing internal mammary artery spasm, though no treatment is also an acceptable strategy as flow naturally doubles.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: