Key result
RV dP/dt-guided rate adaptive ventricular pacing correlates strongly with RV pressure and appropriate rate response.
Why the study?
Does a rate adaptive ventricular pacing system using right ventricular dP/dtMAX provide appropriate heart rate response in patients requiring pacemakers?
Observational (n=10)
Does a rate adaptive ventricular pacing system using right ventricular dP/dtMAX provide appropriate heart rate response in patients requiring pacemakers?
Right ventricular dP/dt is a feasible and suitable parameter for controlling pacing rate in rate-adaptive VVI pacemakers, providing appropriate heart rate response to exercise.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports dP/dt sensor investigation in rate-adaptive pacing; leaves open validation in prospective trials.
Ten patients underwent implantation of a rate adaptive ventricular pacing system with a new pulse generator and lead. The unipolar lead has a steroid eluting tip and a pressure sensor. The first derivative of the signal from this sensor, dP/dt, is determined and the pacemaker rate is varied in response to changes in the right ventricular dP/dtMAX. During implantation, dP/dt values were in the range of 180-720 mm Hg/sec. The autothreshold for pacing at 2.5 V remained unchanged 1 month after implantation (0.065 +/- 0.045 msec, range 0.05-2.00 msec) and only slightly increased after 3 months (0.075 +/- 0.045 msec, range 0.05-2.00 msec). A significant correlation existed between the dP/dt measured during implantation and the right ventricular pressure measured by telemetry at follow-up visits (r = 0.93, P = 0.0001). Initial pacemaker programming was performed on the second day after implantation following a short walk and was adjusted subsequent to follow-up visits according to the patient's subjective assessment and in accordance with the results of exercise tests and Holter monitoring. Exercise and Holter tests did not significantly change initial programming. There was a significant correlation between right ventricular systolic pressure and the rate response setting (r = -0.66, P less than 0.05). During dP/dt pacing, all patients felt well, and eight of these reported an improvement compared to nonrate adaptive pacing. The heart rate response to effort and recovery was appropriate. It was concluded that: (1) right ventricular dP/dt is a suitable parameter for controlling the pacing rate; (2) appropriate programming of the dP/dt pacemaker results in a suitable heart rate response to exercise and recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ovsyshcher et al. (1992) conducted an observational in Patients requiring ventricular pacing (n=10). Rate adaptive ventricular pacing system using right ventricular dP/dt vs. Nonrate adaptive pacing was evaluated on Correlation between dP/dt measured during implantation and right ventricular pressure measured by telemetry at follow-up (r = 0.93, p=0.0001). A rate adaptive ventricular pacing system using right ventricular dP/dt demonstrated a significant correlation with right ventricular pressure (r=0.93, P=0.0001) and appropriate rate response.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: