This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
: The demand for low-power, self-powered, and solution-processed near-infrared (NIR) photodetectors, particularly those avoiding metals like Hg and Cd, and operating within the second biological window (NIR-II, 1000–1350 nm), is driving the development of alternatives to conventional epitaxial semiconductors. This work evaluates a solution-processed, self-powered NIR photodetector up to 1300 nm, employing commercially available, native ligand-preserved indium arsenide (InAs) quantum dots (QDs) integrated into a heterojunction architecture (ITO/ZnO/InAs/PTAA/Ag). Optimization of the sol-gel zinc oxide (ZnO) electron transport layer and poly[bis(4-phenyl)(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)amine] (PTAA) hole transport layer provides a favorable energy cascade for efficient, self-powered charge separation. Under zero external bias, the photodetector exhibits steady state responsivities of 10 -5 and 10 -3 A/W under 980 and 450 nm illumination, respectively. While idealized shot-noise approximations suggest higher theoretical upper bounds, full noise spectral density analysis reveals a low-frequency flicker (1 /f ) noise dominance and low external quantum efficiency (limited to a great extent by the low transmittance of the glass/ITO substrate) that restrict the actual experimentally measured specific detectivity (D*) to a modest range of 1.2×10 7 to 2.6×10 7 Jones between 900 and 1300 nm under 5 Hz modulation. The photodevices demonstrate rapid carrier dynamics with rise and fall times in the range of 1.2 and 1 μs under modulated 450 nm illumination at 62.5 kHz. These findings provide critical insights into the performance limits of non-toxic, native ligand-capped InAs QD photodetectors, highlighting key trade-offs in interface engineering and active layer optimization for future imaging applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shirmohammadi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: