Key result
3D finite-strain damage modeling extends AAA material law validity to ~50% strain versus elastic laws.
A novel finite-strain damage model for AAA walls extends material law validity to 50% strain, offering potential for triggering growth and remodeling processes in mechanobiological models despite not improving rupture prediction.
Supports advanced mechanobiological AAA modeling; leaves open clinical translation and rupture prediction utility.
In the present work, we develop a three-dimensional isotropic finite-strain damage model for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) wall that considers both the characteristic softening of the material caused by damage and the spatial variation of the material properties. A strain energy function is formulated that accounts for a hyperelastic, slightly compressible, isotropic material behavior during the elastic phase, whereas the damage process only contributes to the material response when the elastic limit of the AAA wall is exceeded. Material and damage parameters are obtained by fitting the strain energy function to the experimental data obtained by uniaxial tensile tests of freshly harvested AAA wall samples. The damage model extends the validity of the material law to a strain range of up to 50%. Purely elastic material laws for AAA wall are only valid for a strain range of up to 17%. In a series of finite element simulations of patient-specific AAAs, serving as numerical examples, we investigate the applicability of the damage model. The use of the damage model does not yield a more distinct identification of rupture-prone AAAs than other computational-based risk indices. However, the benefit of the finite-strain damage model is the potential capability to trigger growth and remodeling processes in mechanobiological models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marini et al. (2011) studied Abdominal aortic aneurysm. Three-dimensional isotropic finite-strain damage model vs. Purely elastic material laws was evaluated on Identification of rupture-prone AAAs. A three-dimensional finite-strain damage model extended the validity of the material law for abdominal aortic aneurysm walls to a strain range of up to 50%, compared to 17% for purely elastic laws.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: