Key result
A systolic inter-arm difference greater than 10 mmHg was significantly associated with peripheral vascular disease (OR 5.25) in populations at high vascular risk.
Why the study?
Does home blood pressure monitoring yield reliable and accurate recordings in hypertensive stroke patients?
Does home blood pressure monitoring yield reliable and accurate recordings in hypertensive stroke patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This editorial highlights the need to assess the reliability and accuracy of home blood pressure monitoring in hypertensive stroke patients.
Use of evidence in hypertension guidelinesIn their review of the use of evidence in hypertension guidelines, Parker and Glasziou point out that failure to measure blood pressure in both arms may lead to delay in diagnosis or inadequate treatment of high blood pressure. 1However, only 30% of GPs agree with recommendations to measure blood pressure in both arms, and even fewer actually do it.Similarly, it is important to see if patients who take their own blood pressure at home adhere to recommendations, both measuring and recording their readings correctly.Assessing the reliability of patients' reports of home blood pressure measurements is crucial to see whether self-monitoring can be used by health professionals to provide precise estimates of the true blood pressure. 2Possible disadvantages of this technique include reporting bias and unsupervised alteration of medication.Newer blood pressure monitors offer the advantages of built-in printers or internal storage of all blood pressure measurements, which can be subsequently downloaded. 3 We are completing recruitment for a Stroke Association funded trial of home blood pressure monitoring in 360 hypertensive stroke patients. 4ntervention patients are given a blood pressure monitor, shown how to use it, and asked to record their blood pressure once a week taking three readings each time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christopher E Clark (2009) conducted a letter in High vascular risk. Systolic inter-arm difference >10 mmHg vs. No inter-arm difference >10 mmHg was evaluated on Peripheral vascular disease (OR 5.25, 95% CI 2.85 to 9.70, p=<0.001). A systolic inter-arm difference greater than 10 mmHg was significantly associated with peripheral vascular disease (OR 5.25) in populations at high vascular risk.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: