Key result
Adding ledipasvir to sofosbuvir is linked to ~87% lower emergence of NS5B variant L159F.
Why the study?
Does the emergence of NS5B variants L159F and V321A impact virologic failure or retreatment outcomes in patients treated with sofosbuvir?
Observational (n=403)
Yes
Does the emergence of NS5B variants L159F and V321A impact virologic failure or retreatment outcomes in patients treated with sofosbuvir?
Absolute Event Rate: 15% vs 2%
The emergence of NS5B variants L159F and V321A in patients failing sofosbuvir therapy does not negatively impact subsequent retreatment outcomes with sofosbuvir-based regimens.
Ledipasvir intensification may limit NS5B variant emergence in sofosbuvir failure; leaves open effects on retreatment success.
BACKGROUND: Sofosbuvir (SOF) exhibits a high barrier to resistance, with no S282T NS5B substitution or phenotypic resistance detected in phase 3 registration studies. METHODS: Here, emergence of the NS5B variants L159F and V321A and possible association with resistance was evaluated in 8 studies of SOF (NEUTRINO, FISSION, POSITRON, FUSION, VALENCE, PHOTON-1, PHOTON-2, and P7977-2025) and 5 studies of combination ledipasvir (LDV) and SOF (LDV/SOF; LONESTAR, ELECTRON [LDV/SOF arms], ION1, ION2, and ION3), using deep sequencing. RESULTS: Deep sequencing detected L159F in 15% (53 of 353) and V321A in 5% (17 of 353) of patients with virologic failure in the SOF studies. Intensification of SOF treatment with LDV reduced the emergence of L159F or V321A to 2% (1 of 50 each) at virologic failure. L159F and V321A did not influence the outcome of retreatment with SOF, ribavirin, and pegylated interferon. At baseline, L159F was detected only in genotype 1-infected patients (1%) and was only associated with increased virologic failure in patients treated for short durations with SOF and ribavirin. CONCLUSIONS: Deep-sequencing analysis confirmed that NS5B variants L159F and V321A emerged in a subset of patients treated with SOF at virologic failure. These variants had no impact on retreatment outcome with SOF, ribavirin, and pegylated interferon. Baseline L159F in genotype 1 did not affect the treatment outcome with LDV/SOF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Svarovskaia et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Hepatitis C Virus infection (n=403). Sofosbuvir (SOF) vs. Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) was evaluated on Emergence of L159F variant at virologic failure. NS5B variants L159F and V321A emerged in 15% and 5% of patients with virologic failure on sofosbuvir, respectively, but intensification with ledipasvir reduced emergence to 2% for each.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: