Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In order to assess the accuracy of a recently adjusted relativistic energy-consistent small-core pseudopotential for uranium, the U(5+) (5f(1) subconfiguration) spin-orbit splitting as well as the fine structure of the U(4+) (5f(2) subconfiguration) spectrum have been calculated. The pseudopotential has been adjusted to four-component all-electron data, i.e., at the multiconfiguration Dirac-Hartree-Fock level using the Dirac-Coulomb Hamiltonian with a Fermi nucleus charge distribution and perturbatively including the Breit interaction. Its performance in a dressed effective Hamiltonian spin-orbit configuration interaction framework is compared to that of an older scalar-relativistic Wood-Boring adjusted pseudopotential, supplemented by a valence spin-orbit term, as well as to all-electron calculations using the Douglas-Kroll-Hess Hamiltonian. Electron correlation is accounted for by the multireference configuration interaction method with and without the Davidson correction and with different frozen-orbital spaces. Our best calculations show satisfactory agreement with experimental data; i.e., the mean absolute (relative) deviations amount to 183 (2.4%) and 948 cm(-1) (5.1%) for the U(5+) and the U(4+) fine-structure energy levels, respectively. Even better agreement, comparable to the one for rigorous highly correlated four-component all-electron data, is obtained in intermediate Hamiltonian Fock-space coupled-cluster calculations applying the new pseudopotential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weigand et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: