Key result
Pediatric pulsatile-flow LVAD linked to improved LVEF at 1 month that wanes over time.
Why the study?
Echocardiographic strain and strain-rate imaging is promising for evaluating myocardial function and predicting reverse remodeling, but changes in LV and RV function in pediatric patients with pulsatile LVADs needed evaluation.
Does pulsatile-flow LVAD implantation improve left and right ventricular echocardiographic strain indices in pediatric patients?
Observational (n=18)
Does pulsatile-flow LVAD implantation improve left and right ventricular echocardiographic strain indices in pediatric patients?
In pediatric patients with pulsatile LVADs, left and right ventricular mechanics improve in the short term but this benefit appears to decrease over time.
Transient LVEF gains after pediatric pulsatile LVAD warrant cautious short-term monitoring; leaves open durability and strain effects in prospective trials.
Echocardiographic strain and strain-rate imaging is a promising tool for the evaluation of myocardial segmental function, for the early detection of myocardial dysfunction, and for the prediction of reverse remodeling. We aimed at studying the changes in left and right ventricular function in pulsatile left ventricular assist device pediatric patients by two-dimensional echocardiography and two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. Echocardiographic and clinical data of patients implanted with a pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist device from 2011 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed before and after implantation at 1, 3, and 6 months. A total of 18 patients were enrolled. Median age and weight at implantation were 9 months (5-23 months) and 5.85 kg (4.85-8.75 kg), respectively; median left ventricular assist device support was 181 (114.5-289.5) days. 13 patients (73%) were transplanted and 5 patients (27%) died. At follow-up: left ventricular ejection fraction increase at 1 month (p = 0.001) and 3 months (p = 0.01), left ventricular global longitudinal strain improvement at 1 month (p = 0.0008) and 3 months (p = 0.02), and right ventricular free-wall longitudinal strain increase at 1 month (p = 0.01). At short term after left ventricular assist device implantation, both left ventricular and right ventricular mechanics improved. The temporary benefit seems to decrease over time. The worsening of left ventricular function has been followed by a worsening of right ventricular function probably due to the ventricular interdependence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iacobelli et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Heart failure requiring left ventricular assist device (n=18). Pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist device vs. Before implantation (baseline) was evaluated on Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction at 1 month (p=0.001). Pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist device implantation in pediatric patients improved left ventricular ejection fraction at 1 month (p=0.001), though benefits decreased over time.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: