Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To study the long-term effects of altered cannabinoid receptor activity on myocardial and vascular function, Wistar rats were treated with the selective CB(1) antagonist AM-251 (0.5 mg kg(-1) d(-1)), the potent synthetic cannabinoid HU-210 (50 micro g kg(-1) d(-1)) or vehicle for 12 weeks after coronary artery ligation or sham operation. 2. AM-251 further reduced the pressure-generating capacity, shifted the pressure volume curve to the right (P<0.05) and increased the left-ventricular operating volume (AM-251: 930+/-40 micro l vs control: 820+/-40 micro l vs HU-210: 790+/-50 micro l; P<0.05) in rats with large myocardial infarction (MI). 3. Left-ventricular CB(1) immunoactivity in rats 12 weeks after large MI was unaltered as compared with noninfarcted hearts. 4. Cannabinoid receptor activation through HU-210, a cannabinoid that alters cardiovascular parameters via CB(1) receptors, increased the left-ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP, P<0.05). However, it prevented the drop in left-ventricular systolic pressure (HU-210: 142+/-5 mm Hg; P<0.05 vs control: 124+/-3 mm Hg; and P<0.001 vs AM-251: 114+/-3 mm Hg) and prevented endothelial dysfunction (ED) in aortic rings of rats with large MI (P<0.05). 5. Compared with AM-251, HU-210 prevented the decline in the maximal rate of rise of left-ventricular pressure and the maximum pressure-generating ability (P<0.05). In rats with small MI, HU-210 increased cardiac index (P<0.01) and lowered the total peripheral resistance (P<0.05). 6. The study shows that during the development of congestive heart failure post-large MI, cannabinoid treatment increases LVEDP and prevents hypotension and ED. Presumed CB(1) antagonism promotes remodeling despite unchanged myocardial CB(1) expression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wagner et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: