Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Systemic chemotherapeutics have limited efficacy in many advanced solid tumours. This study evaluated the safety and tolerability of INT230-6, a unique intratumoural (IT) formulation of cisplatin, vinblastine, and 8-((2-hydroxybenzoyl)amino)octanoate (SHAO), an amphiphilic cell-penetration enhancer. METHODS: In this single-arm phase 1/2 trial (NCT03058289), adults with advanced or metastatic disease who progressed on a median of three prior therapies received multiple doses of IT INT230-6 monotherapy once every 28 days or biweekly for five treatments with maintenance dosing every 9 weeks. INT230-6 dose was based on tumour diameter or volume and escalated across five cohorts. A fixed-dose cohort received up to 175 mL. FINDINGS: No dose-limiting toxicities were reported among 64 enrolled patients; seven (10·9%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events (AEs). Overall, 52/64 (81·3%) patients had treatment-related AEs (TRAEs), including grade ≥3 TRAEs (7/64 [10·9%]) and serious TRAEs (3/64 [4·7%]). INT230-6 achieved a disease control rate (DCR) of 75% (48/64 patients) and median overall survival (mOS) of 11·9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6·3-19·4). In an exploratory analysis, patients dosed at ≥40% of total tumour burden vs <40% had improved DCR (40/48 [83·3%] vs 8/16 [50%]) and mOS (18·7 months [95% CI: 11·5-23·5] vs 3·1 months [95% CI: 1·6-5·9]). Fifteen patients survived ≥21 months; eight were alive at study end. INT230-6 induced a qualitative decrease in proliferating cancer cells in injected tumours and a qualitative increase in activated T-cells infiltrating the tumour microenvironment. Ten patients had abscopal responses. INTERPRETATION: IT INT230-6 was well tolerated and manifested promising treatment benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: