Key result
Blood biomarkers show promise for determining cardioembolic stroke etiology and reducing cryptogenic strokes.
Why the study?
Can blood biomarkers accurately diagnose and distinguish cardioembolic stroke from other etiologies?
Can blood biomarkers accurately diagnose and distinguish cardioembolic stroke from other etiologies?
Blood biomarkers represent a promising complement to clinical workup for identifying cardioembolic stroke etiology, which could help optimize secondary prevention.
Hypothesis-generating for stroke etiology workup; should not yet change practice pending prospective validation.
Stroke is one of the main causes of death and disability in the world. Cardioembolic etiology accounts for approximately one fifth of all ischemic strokes whereas 25-30% remains undetermined even after an advanced diagnostic workup. Despite there is not any biomarker currently approved to distinguish cardioembolic stroke among other etiologies in clinical practice the use of biomarkers represents a promising valuable complement to determine stroke etiology reducing the number of cryptogenic strokes and aiding in the prescription of the most appropriated primary and secondary treatments in order to minimize therapeutic risks and to avoid recurrences. In this review we present an update about specific cardioembolic stroke-related biomarkers at a protein, transcriptomic and genetic level. Finally, we also focused on reported biomarkers associated with atrial fibrillation (a cardiac illness strongly related with cardioembolic stroke subtype) thus with a potential to become biomarkers to detect cardioembolic stroke in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Llombart et al. (2014) conducted a review in Cardioembolic stroke. Blood biomarkers was evaluated. Blood biomarkers at the protein, transcriptomic, and genetic levels represent a promising diagnostic tool to determine cardioembolic stroke etiology and reduce the number of cryptogenic strokes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: