Key result
TCD shows moderate anterior and fair posterior agreement with MRA for detecting intracranial artery stenosis.
Why the study?
Intracranial artery stenosis is a common cause of acute cerebral infarction, and this study evaluated the accuracy of transcranial Doppler compared with magnetic resonance angiography for its diagnosis in this population.
Does transcranial Doppler ultrasound accurately diagnose intracranial artery stenosis compared to magnetic resonance angiography in patients with acute cerebral infarction?
Cross-Sectional (n=115)
Does transcranial Doppler ultrasound accurately diagnose intracranial artery stenosis compared to magnetic resonance angiography in patients with acute cerebral infarction?
Transcranial Doppler ultrasound has moderate agreement with magnetic resonance angiography for detecting anterior circulation stenosis and fair agreement for posterior circulation stenosis in patients with acute cerebral infarction.
Background One of the most common causes of acute cerebral infarction (ACI) is intracranial artery stenosis (ICAS). The goal of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of transcranial Doppler (TCD) compared with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for diagnosing ICAS in patients with ACI. Materials and Methods Consecutive patients presenting with ACI to the neurology department underwent both MRA and TCD examination within 6 hours of difference. To calculate the agreement between the results of MRA and TCD, kappa coefficient test was used. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative TCD predictive values have been calculated in comparison with MRA. Results A total of 115 patients was included. There were 77 males (66.95%) and 38 females (33.04%). The mean age of patients was 68.32 ± 10.66 years (range 29–80). The agreement between TCD and MRA in detecting stenosis was 0.56 for anterior circulation artery (ACA), and 0.40 for posterior circulation artery. For the detection of ICAS, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values were 85.9, 90.0, 98.2, and 50.0% for anterior cerebral artery and 73.5, 86.7, 96.2, and 40.0% for posterior cerebral artery, respectively. Conclusions Moderate agreement of anterior circulation stenosis and fair agreement for posterior circulation stenosis was found between TCD and MRA in the evaluation of ICAS. In anterior circulation, the diagnostic accuracy of TCD is higher compared with the posterior circulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jaiswal et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Acute cerebral infarction (n=115). Transcranial Doppler (TCD) vs. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) was evaluated on Agreement between TCD and MRA in detecting intracranial artery stenosis (kappa 0.56 for anterior circulation, 0.40 for posterior circulation). Transcranial Doppler showed moderate agreement (kappa 0.56) for anterior circulation and fair agreement (kappa 0.40) for posterior circulation stenosis compared with MRA in acute cerebral infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: