Key result
Teaching hospital care after OHCA is linked to ~38% higher 30-day survival versus nonteaching hospitals.
Why the study?
Controversy exists regarding how best to organize systems of care for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, with little evidence to guide policy-makers.
Does treatment at teaching hospitals improve 30-day survival in patients arriving alive after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?
Cohort (n=25,346)
Yes
Does treatment at teaching hospitals improve 30-day survival in patients arriving alive after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?
Patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated at teaching hospitals have a significantly higher likelihood of 30-day survival compared to those treated at nonteaching hospitals, supporting regionalized care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Associated survival benefit at teaching hospitals after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; observational data leave open whether regionalization improves outcomes.
Background: Controversy exists about how best to organize systems of care for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), as little evidence exists to guide policy-makers. In Canada, teaching hospitals are mainly cardiac referral centers that are potentially well suited towards treating patients with OHCA. Our objective was to determine whether patients with OHCA are more likely to survive if they present to teaching hospitals. Methods and Results: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study by linking several population-based administrative databases in Ontario, Canada. All patients >20 years old who arrived alive to hospital after OHCA between April 1, 2007, and March 31, 2014, were eligible for inclusion. Patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction were excluded. The primary outcome was survival at 30 days. To determine the association between teaching status and 30-day survival, logistic regression models were used to adjust for baseline differences in patient characteristics. Prespecified analysis was performed stratified by age: ≤65, 66 to 80, and >80 years old. A total of 25 346 patients were included: 5413 at teaching and 19 933 at nonteaching hospitals. Survival at 30 days was 13.9% in teaching and 11.0% ( P <0.001) in nonteaching hospitals. Hospital teaching status was associated with a significantly higher adjusted odds of 30-day survival (odds ratio, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.14–1.67]). This improvement in survival was observed in younger patients (≤65 years: odds ratio, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.14–1.74]; 66 to 80 years: odds ratio,1.37 [95% CI, 1.13–1.67]), but there was no significant difference in the elderly (>80 years: odds ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.79–1.44]). Conclusions: Patients with OHCA treated at teaching hospitals were more likely to survive to 30 days. These findings support current recommendations suggesting that treatment of these patients should be provided at specialized hospitals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Czarnecki et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (n=25,346). Teaching hospital vs. Nonteaching hospital was evaluated on survival at 30 days (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.14-1.67, p=<0.001). Treatment at a teaching hospital after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was associated with higher 30-day survival compared to nonteaching hospitals (13.9% vs 11.0%; OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.14-1.67).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: