Key result
Transmission-competent REVec enables long-term multi-tissue expression without high shedding vs brain-restricted defective vectors.
Why the study?
Little is known about the in vivo tissue tropism and persistence of gene expression of RNA virus-based episomal vectors (REVec).
REVec mediates long-term in vivo transgene expression but requires attenuation of vector-associated pathogenicity for future gene delivery applications.
RNA virus-based episomal vector (REVec) is an emerging viral vector system that mediates long-term stable gene expression in variety of cell types in vitro. However, little is known about its tissue tropism and persistence of gene expression in vivo. Here, to evaluate the feasibility of REVec for in vivo gene delivery, we conducted biodistribution analysis of transmission competent REVec and transmission defective ΔG-REVec in Lewis rats. Following intracranial administration of REVec, transgene expression was detected in various tissues. In contrast, transgene expression was only observed in the brain after ΔG-REVec administration. Low levels of vector shedding in the feces and blood and of neutralizing antibody in the serum were detected after REVec injection. In the brain, microglia, astrocytes and neurons were susceptible to REVec-mediated transduction. However, the animals administered with REVec, but not with ΔG-REVec showed a significant decrease in body weight compared to mock treated animals. Additionally, CD8 T cell infiltration was observed in the brain of these animals. In summary, we demonstrated that REVec promotes long-term transgene expression in vivo without causing high vector shedding or neutralizing antibody production; however, suggests the need to attenuate vector associated pathogenicity in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Komatsu et al. (2020) studied Gene delivery. REVec and ΔG-REVec vs. Mock treatment was evaluated on Transgene expression and biodistribution. Transmission competent REVec promoted long-term transgene expression in various tissues in vivo without causing high vector shedding, whereas defective ΔG-REVec expression was restricted to the brain.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: