Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 14, 2000Environmental Science & Technology

Methyl-Mercury Degradation Pathways: A Comparison among Three Mercury-Impacted Ecosystems

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MMMark Marvin‐DiPasqualeUnited States Geological SurveyJAJennifer L. AgeeUnited States Geological SurveyCMChad McGowan

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Marvin‐DiPasquale et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa4f2eb4ad6d94037dc4080https://doi.org/10.1021/es0013125
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Degradation of Methylmercury by Bacteria Isolated from Environmental Samples1973 · 95 citations
  2. 2Transition Metals in Control of Gene Expression1993 · 630 citations
  3. 3Sulfate stimulation of mercury methylation in freshwater sediments1992 · 1,129 citations
  4. 4Effects of Adaptation on Biodegradation Rates in Sediment/Water Cores from Estuarine and Freshwater Environments1980 · 239 citations
  5. 5Trace Metal Adsorption onto an Acid Mine Drainage Iron(III) Oxy Hydroxy Sulfate1998 · 334 citations