Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The discrepancies of the crystal-field analysis in Cs2NaErCl6 are lowered by letting the 4f11 configuration interact with a charge transfer configuration enclosing a p electron. 75 levels with a total degeneracy equal to 130 were fitted with a mean deviation of 10.5 cm−1, compared with 21.4 cm−1 in the standard model. It is found that: (i) the p electrons involved in the process originate most probably from the six Cl− ligands; (ii) 14% of the 3p6 orbitals are projected onto the central ion coordinate system as an unique orbital with p angular character; (iii) this projected orbital can be coupled with 4fn configurations and handled by tensorial methods; and (iv) the most probable mechanism responsible for the improvement of the crystal-field analysis is a 4f11 3p6-4f123p5 interaction. The first configuration represents Er3+ surrounded by six Cl− ligands, whereas in the second one, the rare-earth ion and the ligands have gained and lost one electron respectively. The crystal-field analysis enables the estimation of the location of the charge transfer band.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Faucher et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: