Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
(45)Ca efflux from single barnacle muscle fibres loaded with radio-calcium by microinjection was studied.2. The (45)Ca washout curve consisted of three exponential phases with half-times of 4.8, 12.6 and 111.1 min.3. Removal of external Ca(2+) reduced (45)Ca efflux by 65%. The (45)Ca efflux recovered upon restoring external Ca(2+), the magnitude of the recovery being dependent upon the external Ca(2+) concentration. 10 mM procaine was found to reduce the magnitude of the recovery.4. Removal of external Mg(2+) resulted in a 38% increase in (45)Ca efflux.5. External application of procaine at pH 7.8 caused a dose-dependent inhibition of (45)Ca efflux. The magnitude of the inhibition was reduced in the presence of low external Ca(2+) concentrations. 10 mM procaine at pH 9.3 caused a biphasic effect: inhibition was followed by stimulation.6. Microinjection of 0.5 M procaine caused only inhibition of (45)Ca efflux, whereas microinjection of 1.5 M procaine caused stimulation followed by inhibition. These effects were observed at an external pH of 7.8 and 9.3.7. Injection of 100 mM-EGTA abolished the stimulatory but not the inhibitory effect produced by procaine injection.8. These results are interpreted as indicating that a major fraction of the (45)Ca efflux involves Ca-Ca exchange which is inhibited by the charged form of procaine in a non-competitive manner at the external surface of the muscle fibre. The stimulatory action is attributed to release by procaine of Ca(2+) from internal binding sites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stephen S. Chen (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: